U.N. says keep your dollars, Obama!
With advancing socialism and re-distributionist mentality, I feel compelled to blog.
DETAILED ANALYSIS: HOUSE DEMOCRATS’ GOVERNMENT TAKEOVER CREATES 53 NEW GOVERNMENT PROGRAMS, OFFICES & BUREAUCRACIES
Democrats continue to claim that their health care legislation will not increase the federal deficit, even though the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office has revealed the truth: the bill actually increases the deficit by $239 billion. One of the reasons it’s so expensive is the plethora of new federal government programs it would create. House Republican Leader John Boehner offered the following comment:
“The American people’s number one concern about health care is controlling cost, so it is baffling that Democrats have put together a $1.5 trillion bill that actually increases the deficit in order to create 53 new government programs. We need to throw away this 1,000-page monstrosity and start over, this time focusing on real, bipartisan reforms that lower costs and expand coverage.”
The House Democrats’ bill creates a massive new federal bureaucracy littered with new federal agencies, new programs, and new bureaucrats. Here they are, as identified by the House Republican Conference, chaired by Rep. Mike Pence (R-IN):
Health Benefits Advisory Committee (Section 123, p. 30) Health Choices Administration (Section 141, p. 41) Qualified Health Benefits Plan Ombudsman (Section 144, p. 47) Program of administrative simplification (Section 163, p. 57) Retiree Reserve Trust Fund (Section 164(d), p. 70) Health Insurance Exchange (Section 201, p. 72) Mechanism for insurance risk pooling to be established by Health Choices Administration Commissioner (Section 206(b), p. 106) Special Inspector General for the Health Insurance Exchange (Section 206(c), p. 107) Health Insurance Exchange Trust Fund (Section 207, p. 109) State-based Health Insurance Exchanges (Section 208, p. 111) “Public Health Insurance Option” (Section 221, p. 116) Ombudsman for “Public Health Insurance Option” (Section 221(d), p. 117) Account for receipts and disbursements for “Public Health Insurance Option” (Section 222(b), p. 119) Telehealth Advisory Committee (Section 1191, p. 380) Demonstration program providing reimbursement for “culturally and linguistically appropriate services” (Section 1222, p. 405) Demonstration program for shared decision making using patient decision aids (Section 1236, p. 438) Accountable Care Organization pilot program (Section 1301, p. 443) Independent patient-centered medical home pilot program under Medicare (Section 1302, p. 462) Community-based medical home pilot program under Medicare (Section 1302(d), p. 468) Center for Comparative Effectiveness Research (Section 1401(a), p. 502) Comparative Effectiveness Research Commission (Section 1401(a), p. 505) Patient ombudsman for comparative effectiveness research (Section 1401(a), p. 519) Quality assurance and performance improvement program for skilled nursing facilities (Section 1412(b)(1), p. 546) Quality assurance and performance improvement program for nursing facilities (Section 1412 (b)(2), p. 548) Special focus facility program for skilled nursing facilities (Section 1413(a)(3), p. 559) Special focus facility program for nursing facilities (Section 1413(b)(3), p. 565) National independent monitor pilot program for skilled nursing facilities and nursing facilities (Section 1422, p. 607) Demonstration program for approved teaching health centers with respect to Medicare GME (Section 1502(d), p. 674) Pilot program to develop anti-fraud compliance systems for Medicare providers (Section 1635, p. 716) Medical home pilot program under Medicaid (Section 1722, p. 780) Comparative Effectiveness Research Trust Fund (Section 1802, p. 824) “Identifiable office or program” within CMS to “provide for improved coordination between Medicare and Medicaid in the case of dual eligibles” (Section 1905, p. 852) Public Health Investment Fund (Section 2002, p. 859) Scholarships for service in health professional needs areas (Section 2211, p. 870) Loan repayment program for service in health professional needs areas (Section 2211, p. 873) Program for training medical residents in community-based settings (Section 2214, p. 882) Grant program for training in dentistry programs (Section 2215, p. 887) Public Health Workforce Corps (Section 2231, p. 898) Public health workforce scholarship program (Section 2231, p. 900) Public health workforce loan forgiveness program (Section 2231, p. 904) Grant program for innovations in interdisciplinary care (Section 2252, p. 917) Advisory Committee on Health Workforce Evaluation and Assessment (Section 2261, p. 920) Prevention and Wellness Trust (Section 2301, p. 932) Clinical Prevention Stakeholders Board (Section 2301, p. 941) Community Prevention Stakeholders Board (Section 2301, p. 947) Grant program for community prevention and wellness research (Section 2301, p. 950) Grant program for community prevention and wellness services (Section 2301, p. 951) Grant program for public health infrastructure (Section 2301, p. 955) Center for Quality Improvement (Section 2401, p. 965) Assistant Secretary for Health Information (Section 2402, p. 972) Grant program to support the operation of school-based health clinics (Section 2511, p. 993) National Medical Device Registry (Section 2521, p. 1001) Grants for labor-management programs for nursing training (Section 2531, p. 1008)REPUBLICAN LEADER PRESS OFFICE
REP. JOHN BOEHNER (R-OH)
H-204, THE CAPITOL
(202) 225-4000 | GOPLEADER.GOV
BREAKING: Charles Krauthhammer, whose words are always carefully weighed, believes Obama-Care 1.0 will die. He suggested a Obama-care 2.0 to replace it. LINK to Krauthhammer article.
At this point, I still believe some form Obama-care will become law. The Democrats have the votes. They can ram it through. Whether that benefits them in the long run is debatable.
Liberal Dynasty
But consider this: Obama-Care will be the Democrat’s flagship program like Social Security was 60 years ago. No matter how bad it is; the liberal media will provide cover. Democrats will tout their socialized medicine as the beginning of their socialist workers paradise.
At every national election, Democrats will scare voters by claiming that if they (the Democrats) lose the election the medical coverage that voters depend on will end. Of course, they will promise fixes and more funding in the healthcare system. This link show what the British liberals say at election time.
Obama-care is not about health. It’s about creating a socialist-Democrat dynasty in the United States!
Not Compatible With Open Borders
Free medical care and open borders are not compatible. Illegal aliens from the Caribbean, Central American, and South America will stream into the U.S.
The U.S. cannot fund a national health care system and a strong military. This has been the case in Europe where our NATO allies have all but pulled the plug on their military machines. There are hints that emaciating the military is one of the objectives of the socialists who support Obama-care.
Risky Lifestyles Will Cost Taxpayers
America is a nation of millions of people living risky lifestyles. Whether it is obesity, drug use, or promiscuous and deviant (and now legal) sexual activities, many of these Americans will need long-term medical care, paid for by the taxpayers who have lived non-risky life styles.
Many of the people, who exercise their “First Amendment rights” and mark their bodies with hideous tattoos, may one day face the the consequences. Hepatitis C and other viral diseases will require years and thousands of dollars of treatment. LINK to the Mayo Clinic.
Here is what I see Obama-care will introduce:
Look At Socialized Med In Canada, U.K.
No one knows the future, but we can look at countries where socialized medicine is used today.
These health care systems are in chaos! For example:
The list goes on.
I studied economics using a textbook written by Milton Freidman.
Friedman puts Donahue under the table. Watch and enjoy.
Leave it to The Nose On Your Face to explain Obama-Care.
See more videos that are so fake you would swear it came from the Main Stream Media by going to TNOYF.com.
Leave it to the British to look at American politics with clarity. O-bow-MA Friday attended a White House Correspondents Dinner and heard what the British newsman, Tony Harnden of the London Telegraph, described as a crass, hateful, and disgusting diatribe.
That was so true, too!
Harnden wrote in the Telegraph:
What was Wanda Sykes thinking? Perhaps more to the point, what was President Barack Obama thinking when he laughed and smiled as the comedienne wished Rush Limbaugh dead?
Although the Left is reporting her White House Correspondents' Dinner speech as "taking shots" at Limbaugh and mocking everyone, that's a gross misrepresentation of what turned into a hateful and disgusting diatribe.
I was at the dinner and I began by laughing at Sykes's gentle teases about the press loving Obama so much they never capture him on film smoking but often seem to get him on the beach.
It was amusing when she quipped that Obama trying so hard to be all things to all men that the next thing is he'll be seen mowing the White House lawn.
But the speech took a very ugly turn when she laid into Limbaugh.
Read it all by CLICKING HERE.